The “ecclesiology/ies” of DIY punk rock

2009 February 16
by m

Over the past year or so I have given a couple talks on punk rock and ecclesiology. I’m currently working some of those thoughts into a proper paper (partially as a distraction from another paper!). In the paper I hope to show that the Church can learn from the world of DIY punk rock culture in two ways. First, it can learn from these communities, as other communities and projects have, sets of practices that are “fitting” for the life of the Church, particularly in terms of the practice of making and experiencing music. Various Christian communities have engaged in reflection and action developing practices that could be said to “anticipate the Kingdom of God,” sometimes by borrowing “fitting” practices from the wider culture(s), for example, practices which embody a respect for creation (such as new Christian agrarian movements) or a resistance to North American middle class consumer culture (such as fair trade and buy local campaigns). The music making practices of the DIY music community can help individual Christians and their communities to imagine what our music-making (and music-“consuming”) practices would look like as Kingdom practices.

On a deeper, and more explicitly ecclesiological, level, the “ecclesiology/ies” of DIY punk communities—i.e., their understanding of themselves as communities that are, in a sense, “called out” of the world as a revolutionary way of engaging the world—can help the Church to reflect more deeply about what it means to be the Church, that is, about what kind of community the Church should be in the world, its socio-political character, its revolutionary potential, etc. In short, what would the Church look like if we thought of it in terms of DIY culture making and political action?

8 Responses leave one →
  1. 2009 February 17
    Fran permalink

    I cannot say that this is a topic (DIY punk) that I have anything to contribute about, but I can say that I am intrigued by your thinking and pursuit here. Thank you.

  2. 2009 February 17
    craig permalink

    Very interesting! I don’t think, following the DIY music model, the churches would or could reach out very much beyond their own core. But they would certainly be very energized within, and tap into everyone’s talents.
    When I hear “church” I think RC, but I wonder how your model compares with the little storefront pentecostal churches one sees.
    You could call it Calvin(Johnson)ism

  3. 2009 February 17

    I hope your paper balances some of the advantages and disadvantages that the internet, mp3 players, etc. have brought about to making your own music. And the way some of those technologies are structured in sort of anti-independent ways.

  4. 2009 February 17

    Yes I was thinking about that this morning… that when I was first involved in DIY circles, it was pre-internet, pre-mp3, pre-digital recording, etc. There certainly are advantages and disadvantages, and I’ll touch on that in the paper, but only a bit. Maybe I can explore it more thoroughly in another paper.

  5. 2009 February 17

    I have had these conversations with people in the last few years. The paper should be great and I hope you keep us up to date.

  6. 2009 February 17

    I can’t wait to see this, man.

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. catholicanarchy.org™ » On the possibility of a sectarian, liberationist ecclesiology
  2. Pie and Coffee » Lent 2010

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS