Howard Zinn on why he’s voting for Obama
by m
As you might guess, I love the activist scholarship of Howard Zinn. My first post at Vox Nova was a short one on the family as domestic church, referencing Howard Zinn’s view of the power of families to be “pockets of insurrection” in the united states. I thought of this post recently in my own personal reflection on becoming a “radical Catholic dad,” which will take place at the end of the month. I expect my blogging will explore entirely new themes with the coming of this new phase of life.
Here is an excerpt from Zinn’s article in the Progressive on why he is voting for Obama:
One might assume from the above that I see no difference between McCain and Obama, that I see them as equivalent. Not so. There is a difference, not a significant enough difference for me to have confidence in Obama as President, but just enough for me to vote for Obama and to hope he defeats McCain.Whoever is President, the crucial factor for change will be how much agitation there is in the country on behalf of change. I am guessing that Obama may be more sensitive than McCain to such turmoil, since it will come from his supporters, from the enthusiasts who will register their disillusionment by taking to the streets. Franklin D. Roosevelt was not a radical, but he was more sensitive to the economic crisis in the country and more susceptible to pressure from the Left than was Herbert Hoover.
Even for th e “purest” of radicals, there must be recognition of differences that may mean life or death for thousands. In France at the time of the Algerian War, the election of DeGaulle—hardly an anti-imperialist but more aware of the inevitable decline of empires—was significant in ending that long and brutal occupation.
I have no doubt that by far the wisest, most reliable, with the most integrity, of all recent Presidential candidates is Ralph Nader. But I think it is a waste of his political strength, a puny act, to expend it in the electoral arena, where the result can show only weakness. His power, his intelligence, lies in the mobilization of people outside the ballot box.
So, yes, I will vote for Obama, because the corrupt political system offers me no choice, but only for the moment I pull down the lever in the voting booth.
Before and after that moment I want to use whatever energy I have to push him toward a recognition that he must defy the traditional thinkers and corporate interests surrounding him, and pay homage to the millions of Americans who want real change.

Comments
Zinn’s got a good point. I think you could make a similar comparison to Kennedy’s administration. As reactionary as Kennedy was in terms of escalating the Vietnam War, his election to the presidency did have a positive psychological effect on progressive political elements in the country. Could it not be argued that the New Left would not have been as integrated into the mainstream of American politics had it not been for Camelot’s effect on America’s progressive political elements?
That’s a pretty high political bang for a relatively cheap political buck, considering it takes thirty minutes to walk to your polling place and pull a lever.
Hey! When are you guys due? Lydia and I are having a baby in February! How exciting. Also, I’m not sure if I should be surprised that Zinn is voting for Obama or not. I’m having trouble, personally, deciding whether voting is a worthwhile action this time around. Neither candidate, from my perspective, will do much either to end the death penalty or to curb the power of the Western military industrial complex so – for me – I wonder if a vote for the likes of Cynthia McKinney or one of the other third party candidates might be worthwhile. Who knows. I can register and vote in one-stop voting beginning the 16th of this month – so we’ll see what happens after that.
Peace,
A.T.
Zinn is wonderful. Thanks for posting this.
I have found that as a dad these issues become heightened in the best way – that is I get to share my ideas and perspectives with my children who ask lots of questions and have lots of wonder. These teaches me to better know what I know and think through things as responsibly as I can. To explain something is to know it that much clearer.
Congrats on soon become a new father. Children are a great blessing.
thanks bub.
and andy i agree.
jxx
a. tatum – due oct 25! congrats to you and lydia!
Hi Michael,
I’ve never met you but I check your always interesting website with some frequency. At any rate, I’ll be in Chicago for the Transformed by Hope conference (which I found out about through catholicanarchy.org). I’ll also be in town for the AAR conference. It’d be nice to meet you and maybe grab a cup of coffee or something.
Peace to you,
Tim
[...] Click here for a video interview with Noam Chomsky on the presidential election. While he has argued for years that the political system of the united states has one party — the Business Party — which has two factions, to hold the view that there are no differences at all between these two factions is to ignore the ways in which the the differing policies do in fact have an effect on people’s lives. Like his friend and fellow anarchist Howard Zinn, Chomsky suggests voting for Barack Obama, but without illusions, as he is clearly the lesser of two evils. Chomsky’s reflections on why universal health care has become “politically possible” are particularly insightful. [...]
An Alternative to Capitalism?
The following link, takes you to a “utopian” article, entitled “Home of the Brave?” which I wrote and appeared in the Athenaeum Library of Philosophy:
http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/steinsvold.htm
John Steinsvold